Head to head
Accessibility Scanner vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Accessibility Scanner
?io.github.Bishop81/accessibility-scanner-mcpNo reviews yet
Scan any URL for WCAG accessibility issues (axe-core) and get per-element fixes for an AI agent.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Accessibility Scanner runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Accessibility Scanner | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A99/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 533 |
| Downloads / week | – | 297 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |