Head to head
EasyEDA Copilot vs Goodeye
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect MCP clients to EasyEDA Desktop for schematic and PCB design, routing, inspection, and DRC.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Design, save, and run outcome-aligned AI workflows and verifiers, with reliable image output.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Goodeye (97/100 against 85). Goodeye is hosted and callable through the gateway; EasyEDA Copilot runs on your own machine. EasyEDA Copilot has noticeably more public adoption.
| EasyEDA Copilot | Goodeye | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 242 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Media | Media |