Head to head
Memory Arbiter vs Google Health
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Memory Arbiter
Aio.github.billy12151/memory-arbiter-mcpNo reviews yet
Local SQLite MCP memory: evidence-based recall, advisory conflict notices, authorized governance.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Google Health API, with a local SQLite cache and trend analysis.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). Memory Arbiter has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memory Arbiter | Google Health | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.6k | 61 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 19 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |