Head to head
MCP vs Decaframe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
The output layer for AI agents: turn what an agent produced into a finished file.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Decaframe (94/100 against 75).
| MCP | Decaframe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 491 | 135 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |