Head to head
Pour Picks vs Engraphy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search the Pour Picks bourbon & whiskey database: 4,700+ bottles with tasting profiles and prices.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP memory server: a typed knowledge graph on Postgres 16 and pgvector.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pour Picks (88/100 against 73). Pour Picks is hosted and callable through the gateway; Engraphy runs on your own machine. Pour Picks has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pour Picks | Engraphy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 204 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |