Head to head
XploitScan vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security scanner for AI-generated code. Scan, explain rules, and grade before you ship.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (86/100 against 65). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| XploitScan | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 233 | 778 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Security | Security |