Head to head
Genefoundry vs code-index
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP gateway federating 22 biomedical MCP servers behind one endpoint: gnomAD, ClinVar, HPO, VEP.
Full listingcode-index
Bio.github.Regsorm/code-indexNo reviews yet
Rust code index MCP server, native 1C:Enterprise (BSL) support. 32 tools, AST for 14 languages.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Genefoundry (97/100 against 77). Genefoundry is hosted and callable through the gateway; code-index runs on your own machine. code-index has noticeably more public adoption.
| Genefoundry | code-index | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 117 |
| Downloads / week | – | 649 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |