Head to head
Genefoundry vs gograph
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP gateway federating 22 biomedical MCP servers behind one endpoint: gnomAD, ClinVar, HPO, VEP.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Local Go repository call graphs and structural analysis for coding agents over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Genefoundry (97/100 against 88). Genefoundry is hosted and callable through the gateway; gograph runs on your own machine.
| Genefoundry | gograph | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 224 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |