Head to head
genefoundry vs AI Usage
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
genefoundry
Aio.github.berntpopp/genefoundryNo reviews yet
MCP gateway federating 22 biomedical MCP servers behind one endpoint: gnomAD, ClinVar, HPO, VEP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reports real token usage and cost from Claude Code and OpenCode data. Nothing leaves your machine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours genefoundry (97/100 against 74). genefoundry is hosted and callable through the gateway; AI Usage runs on your own machine. AI Usage has noticeably more public adoption.
| genefoundry | AI Usage | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 436 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |