Head to head
Stellar Agent Search vs Scholar Feed
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Discover and rank Stellar 8004 agents with a read-only MCP server and fail-closed contract probes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Rank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stellar Agent Search (88/100 against 79). Scholar Feed is hosted and callable through the gateway; Stellar Agent Search runs on your own machine. Scholar Feed has noticeably more public adoption.
| Stellar Agent Search | Scholar Feed | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B79/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 11 |
| Downloads / week | 31 | 187 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 13 | 27 |
| Write actions | — | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-07-30 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |