Head to head
Ifc Ruhsat vs Grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Yapı ruhsatı IFC modelini Türkiye dijital proje yönetmeliğine (RG 33331) göre denetler; EK-9 formu
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 98 out of 100). Grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ifc Ruhsat runs on your own machine. Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ifc Ruhsat | Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |