Mmcp.market

Head to head

Cartographer vs Humanread Publisher

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Cartographerio.github.BeppeTemp/cartographer
A
No reviews yet

Governance MCP server for agent-maintained knowledge bases (OKF): git-backed writes, search, lint.

Full listing
Humanread Publishertw.surl.humanread/publisher
C
No reviews yet

Publish Git-backed multilingual novels with agents, safe layouts, reviews, and author approval.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cartographer (88/100 against 60). Humanread Publisher is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cartographer runs on your own machine. Cartographer has noticeably more public adoption.

 CartographerHumanread Publisher
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA88/100C60/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars23
Downloads / week
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-18
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons