Head to head
Groundcheck vs API
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verify claims, resolve FIGI identity, extract claims, and sign x402 delivery receipts over MCP.
Full listingNo reviews yet
AI document intelligence: extract, summarize, claim-check, notarize, and signed action receipts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Groundcheck (91/100 against 60). Groundcheck has noticeably more public adoption.
| Groundcheck | API | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 37 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 22 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |