Head to head
b/cited vs VulnCheck
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
No reviews yet
VulnCheck exploit intelligence — CVE research, exploit data, advisories, and threat analysis.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours VulnCheck (90/100 against 76). b/cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; VulnCheck runs on your own machine. VulnCheck has noticeably more public adoption.
| b/cited | VulnCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 10 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |