Head to head
b/cited vs Security Txt Cra Lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Txt Cra Lint (89/100 against 76). b/cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; Security Txt Cra Lint runs on your own machine. Security Txt Cra Lint has noticeably more public adoption.
| b/cited | Security Txt Cra Lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 377 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |