Mmcp.market

Head to head

Verirun vs agentburn

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Verirunio.github.baopeak/verirun
C
No reviews yet

Execution-grounded verification for AI coding agents on Windows: evidence, not agent claims.

Full listing
agentburnio.github.Socialpranker/agentburn
A
No reviews yet

Local profiler: which usage window took you out, and where your agent's money goes

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agentburn (89/100 against 65). agentburn has noticeably more public adoption.

 Verirunagentburn
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100A89/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–113
Downloads / week349172
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools18—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release—2026-09-14
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Verirun vs MCPVerirun vs ContextStream MCP ServerVerirun vs OrcareplayVerirun vs Total Agent MemoryVerirun vs GitWarrenAll AI and agents servers