Head to head
Site vs Pseudolife Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Bank Code Lookup: the site's own MCP server — dataset, enquiry (enquiry = a human handoff, not a...
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for MCP-compatible agents: memory bank, fact cortex, dreams, graph.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pseudolife Memory (89/100 against 60). Site is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pseudolife Memory runs on your own machine. Pseudolife Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| Site | Pseudolife Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 116 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 10 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |