Head to head
Openevidence vs MCP Browser
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Unofficial MCP server connecting OpenEvidence to AI agents via authenticated browser sessions
Full listingNo reviews yet
Browser automation using the user's Chromium session — JS execution, auth, and anti-bot support.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Openevidence (92/100 against 80).
| Openevidence | MCP Browser | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | 58 | 133 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 5 | 13 |
| Write actions | 1 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-08-12 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |