Head to head
Penny Search vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Penny Search
Cio.github.ayoubsalem-spec/penny-searchNo reviews yet
Live web search for AI agents, paid per call with x402 USDC on Base.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Octocode (94/100 against 67). Penny Search is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Penny Search | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 467 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |