Head to head
Memorix vs Scrapingant
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
Full listing
No reviews yet
ScrapingAnt MCP — wraps the ScrapingAnt web scraping API (scrapingant.com)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scrapingant (77/100 against 66). Scrapingant is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memorix runs on your own machine. Memorix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memorix | Scrapingant | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 788 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.4k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 47 | 39 |
| Write actions | 9 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |