Head to head
Memorix vs Autocarver
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Qualify dataset columns and process them against a target with AutoCarver, fully on your machine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Autocarver (92/100 against 66). Memorix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memorix | Autocarver | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 785 | 11 |
| Downloads / week | 16k | 636 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |