Head to head
SEO Monster vs That SEO Agent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first SEO MCP: track AI citations, Search Console, GA4, PageSpeed, Cloudflare, IndexNow, CrUX.
Full listingNo reviews yet
SEO analysis for sites you own: Google Search Console, GA4, PageSpeed, and full site audits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours That SEO Agent (98/100 against 85). That SEO Agent is hosted and callable through the gateway; SEO Monster runs on your own machine. SEO Monster has noticeably more public adoption.
| SEO Monster | That SEO Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 321 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-08-25 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |