Head to head
Agent Health vs Uptime Kuma
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Agent Health
Cwork.autonet/agent-healthNo reviews yet
Free owned-agent uptime monitoring, DNS domain proof, signed alerts and opt-in endpoint checks.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Uptime Kuma (83/100 against 60). Agent Health is hosted and callable through the gateway; Uptime Kuma runs on your own machine. Uptime Kuma has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent Health | Uptime Kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 49 |
| Downloads / week | – | 357 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 21 | 31 |
| Write actions | 6 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |