Head to head
Apra vs Pseudolife Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query APRA in plain English — bank capital, fund-level super, insurance stats.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for MCP-compatible agents: memory bank, fact cortex, dreams, graph.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 89 out of 100). Pseudolife Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| Apra | Pseudolife Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 116 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |