Head to head
Ausca vs Numguard
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
Full listingNumguard
Cio.github.ipezygj/numguardNo reviews yet
Verify a number before an agent asserts it — evals, backtests (Deflated Sharpe), signed receipts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 65). Ausca is hosted and callable through the gateway; Numguard runs on your own machine. Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ausca | Numguard | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 15 | – |
| Downloads / week | 220 | 24 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 35 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |