Head to head
Aurora vs ShipStatic
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Create, edit, preview, and deploy full-stack web apps to a live URL from any MCP client.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy static websites from AI agents. Free at mcp.shipstatic.com — no install, no signup.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ShipStatic (88/100 against 70). ShipStatic has noticeably more public adoption.
| Aurora | ShipStatic | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.8k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |