Head to head
CharterBench vs HKEx Filings
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every U.S. bank and credit union: ratios, peers, growth and change signals from FDIC/NCUA filings.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HKEx Filings (91/100 against 55). HKEx Filings is hosted and callable through the gateway; CharterBench runs on your own machine. HKEx Filings has noticeably more public adoption.
| CharterBench | HKEx Filings | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 15 |
| Downloads / week | 812 | 390 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |