Head to head
mcp-trademarks vs Tenjin
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-trademarks
Bio.github.atomno-mcp/mcp-trademarksNo reviews yet
FIPS trademark card by number; paid name search uses the client contract.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read & publish paid essays. Pay-per-read in USDC on Base (x402); wallet-only, no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 75 out of 100). Tenjin is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-trademarks runs on your own machine. Tenjin has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-trademarks | Tenjin | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 63 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 23 |
| Write actions | — | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |