Head to head
mcp-seo-audit vs Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-seo-audit
Bio.github.atomno-mcp/mcp-seo-auditNo reviews yet
Technical SEO site audit MCP: health score, issues, robots, sitemap, JSON-LD.
Full listing
No reviews yet
20 free dev tools: JSON/YAML, XML/SQL, Cron, SEO, QR code, URL shortener, cron tasks, files
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-seo-audit (82/100 against 57). Tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-seo-audit runs on your own machine. mcp-seo-audit has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-seo-audit | Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 33 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |