Head to head
AtlasFetch vs mcp-grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
AtlasFetch
Cxyz.atlasfetch/atlasfetchNo reviews yet
Reverse geocode a coordinate to country, region and municipality, and match your own geofences.
Full listingmcp-grafana
Aio.github.grafana/mcp-grafanaNo reviews yet
An MCP server giving access to Grafana dashboards, data and more.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-grafana (99/100 against 66). mcp-grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; AtlasFetch runs on your own machine.
| AtlasFetch | mcp-grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |