Head to head
Tradingview vs Cryptorank
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time market data, screeners, technical analysis & backtesting for stocks, crypto and forex.
Full listingCryptorank
Cio.github.mrfentmen/cryptorank-mcpNo reviews yet
Crypto rankings from CryptoRank. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tradingview (87/100 against 65). Tradingview is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cryptorank runs on your own machine. Tradingview has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tradingview | Cryptorank | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 4.6k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |