Mmcp.market

Head to head

Web Browser (kogiQA) vs Figranium MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Web Browser (kogiQA)com.atagon/kogiqa-mcp
C
No reviews yet

This web browser has been designed to help your agent debug and develop complex web applications.

Full listing
Figranium MCPio.github.figranium/figranium-mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for creating, running, inspecting, and scheduling Figranium browser automations.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Figranium MCP (91/100 against 55).

 Web Browser (kogiQA)Figranium MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars955
Downloads / week384297
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—15
Write actions—6
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-082026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Web Browser (kogiQA) vs SeleniumBase MCPWeb Browser (kogiQA) vs AIHawkWeb Browser (kogiQA) vs ScrapelessWeb Browser (kogiQA) vs MCPWeb Browser (kogiQA) vs Aginx BrowserAll Scraping and browsing servers