Head to head
Web Browser (kogiQA) vs Feedthrough
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
This web browser has been designed to help your agent debug and develop complex web applications.
Full listingFeedthrough
Aio.github.feedthrough/feedthroughNo reviews yet
Debug bridge inside your web app: an agent reads the DOM, console and network. Any browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Feedthrough (91/100 against 55). Web Browser (kogiQA) has noticeably more public adoption.
| Web Browser (kogiQA) | Feedthrough | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 95 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 384 | 62 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 16 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |