Head to head
MCP Server vs ship.page
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pre-deploy ship gate AI agents call before shipping. Also audits the agent's own MCP config.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy HTML from any agent: POST markup, get a live URL. Static hosting API with MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (85/100 against 60). ship.page is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | ship.page | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 73 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 11 |
| Write actions | 2 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |