Head to head
Assistant Mail MCP vs Agent-Native Mail
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-Native Superhuman - email client with keyboard shortcuts and AI triage
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Mail (98/100 against 82). Agent-Native Mail is hosted and callable through the gateway; Assistant Mail MCP runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Mail has noticeably more public adoption.
| Assistant Mail MCP | Agent-Native Mail | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4.9k |
| Downloads / week | 51 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 22 | — |
| Write actions | 8 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category |