Head to head
ASMHunter vs TaScan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ASMHunter
Capp.asmhunter/asmhunter-mcpNo reviews yet
Drive ASMHunter attack-surface monitoring from an AI agent: recon, scans, findings, reports.
Full listing
No reviews yet
36 MCP tools for projects, tasks, workers, QR/NFC tags, and AI remediation. Task. Scan. Done.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours TaScan (86/100 against 58). TaScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; ASMHunter runs on your own machine. TaScan has noticeably more public adoption.
| ASMHunter | TaScan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C58/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 573 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 34 | 80 |
| Write actions | 9 | 23 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |