Head to head
ASMHunter vs gflow-cli
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ASMHunter
Capp.asmhunter/asmhunter-mcpNo reviews yet
Drive ASMHunter attack-surface monitoring from an AI agent: recon, scans, findings, reports.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours gflow-cli (92/100 against 58). gflow-cli has noticeably more public adoption.
| ASMHunter | gflow-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C58/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 216 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 34 | — |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |