Head to head
Loki Mode vs Web Access Gateway
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 36 tools over stdio.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Paid web, news, company, product, and geographic search plus clean page reading for agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Loki Mode (77/100 against 69). Web Access Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; Loki Mode runs on your own machine. Loki Mode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Loki Mode | Web Access Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 1.1k | – |
| Downloads / week | 4.8k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 43 | 8 |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |