Mmcp.market

Head to head

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs TerraVision

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysisio.github.ashfordeOU/grasp
C
No reviews yet

Codebase analysis: dependency graphs, security scanning, and refactor plans for GitHub and GitLab.

Full listing
TerraVisionio.github.patrickchugh/terravision
A
No reviews yet

Cloud architecture diagrams with official AWS, Azure and GCP icons, from Terraform or a JSON graph.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours TerraVision (85/100 against 55). TerraVision has noticeably more public adoption.

 Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisTerraVision
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars231.6k
Downloads / week84743
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools100—
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-072026-09-14
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs oveccGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Gk CLIGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Dep DiffGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs GitlabGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs GitHubAll Developer tools servers