Mmcp.market

Head to head

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs Contentrain

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysisio.github.ashfordeOU/grasp
?
No reviews yet

Codebase analysis: dependency graphs, security scanning, and refactor plans for GitHub and GitLab.

Full listing
Contentrainio.github.Contentrain/contentrain
A
No reviews yet

Git-native content governance for AI agents — 27 deterministic MCP tools over stdio and HTTP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Contentrain is hosted and callable through the gateway; Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis runs on your own machine. Contentrain has noticeably more public adoption.

 Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisContentrain
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety grade?A86/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–4
Downloads / week–1.5k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs gitlab-mcpGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs kubernetes-mcp-serverGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs GitHubGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs notion-mcp-serverGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs homebutlerAll Developer tools servers