Head to head
Share Artifacts vs jCodemunch MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Publish and update safe static HTML reports, presentations, and explainers with controlled sharing.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Share Artifacts (97/100 against 66). Share Artifacts is hosted and callable through the gateway; jCodemunch MCP runs on your own machine. jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Share Artifacts | jCodemunch MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2.7k |
| Downloads / week | – | 6.0k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |