Head to head
Exomem vs mFlow
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local Markdown/Obsidian knowledge substrate for MCP agents with governed memory and hybrid search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Exomem (92/100 against 60). mFlow is hosted and callable through the gateway; Exomem runs on your own machine. Exomem has noticeably more public adoption.
| Exomem | mFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 10 | – |
| Downloads / week | 3.6k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |