Head to head
Mbox vs flightclaw
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search local email archives (.mbox/.eml) entirely on your machine. No OAuth, no cloud.
Full listingflightclaw
Acom.flightclaw/flightclawNo reviews yet
Search ~300 airlines and book flights with a checkout link. OAuth sign-in by email code.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours flightclaw (98/100 against 88). flightclaw is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mbox runs on your own machine.
| Mbox | flightclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 74 |
| Downloads / week | 17k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-14 | 2026-09-26 |
| Category |