Head to head
Figsnap vs PreteWorks API
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
The Figma file you have open, as MCP tools. Extract, edit, and keep a saved set.
Full listing
No reviews yet
One key for the document-to-web pipeline: scrape, AI-extract, build & edit PDFs, fill forms.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Figsnap (83/100 against 63). PreteWorks API is hosted and callable through the gateway; Figsnap runs on your own machine. Figsnap has noticeably more public adoption.
| Figsnap | PreteWorks API | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C63/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 39 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 41 | 29 |
| Write actions | 8 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |