Head to head
Database Postgres vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL. Read-only by default, row caps, timeouts, secrets never logged.
Full listingPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Cio.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardenedNo reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Database Postgres (83/100 against 68).
| Database Postgres | PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 48 | 91 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |