Head to head
Database Libsql vs Quarry
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for libSQL/Turso, local or remote. Read-only by default, row caps, timeouts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Safety-railed database access for agents: Postgres, MySQL, Redis. Read-only by default.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Quarry (94/100 against 83).
| Database Libsql | Quarry | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 24 | 324 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |