Head to head
site-spec vs Sitejar Web Compliance Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server: audit any website for SEO, accessibility, and AI-searchability, then auto-fix it.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Scan a web page for accessibility, security, privacy, quality and SEO issues, with fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours site-spec (85/100 against 67). Sitejar Web Compliance Scanner is hosted and callable through the gateway; site-spec runs on your own machine. site-spec has noticeably more public adoption.
| site-spec | Sitejar Web Compliance Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 28 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |