Head to head
archstone vs Cords to cubic meters, number discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
archstone
Aio.github.Archstone-Romania/archstoneNo reviews yet
Compile your own business capabilities from declarative YAML and serve them as MCP tools.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours archstone (91/100 against 81). Cords to cubic meters, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; archstone runs on your own machine. archstone has noticeably more public adoption.
| archstone | Cords to cubic meters, number discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 650 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |