Head to head
Arbitron vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Funding rates, cross-venue spreads and listings for crypto perpetual futures. Read-only.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Crypto market intelligence: prices, funding rates, narratives, regime, and delta-neutral research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (91/100 against 70). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arbitron | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 96 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 31 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |