Head to head
Apricot vs agent-device
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 94 out of 100). Apricot is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| Apricot | agent-device | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4.7k |
| Downloads / week | – | 118k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |